Static Made

Written + produced with love in the City of Champions.

 

About | Feeds | Podcast | Archive

Pretty Anti-Social →

Nick Bilton on the new Flickr design:

Where Flickr deviates from the rest of the social pack, however, is with the company’s choice not to show how many friends or followers a user has.

This is something I’ve always loved about Flickr and a concept I’ve been pondering quite a bit recently. What if our follower counts on other platforms like Twitter and Facebook were not publicly viewable? How would that change the way we participate on these services, our objectives on them and how we interact with each other through them?

One of Flickr’s strengths has always been its community of users and I can’t help but think it’s because the quest for more followers has been removed from the equation.

The Perfect Television

This post is a riff on Koven Smith’s A Secret Thread From MW2013: Design and inspired by a John Roderick rant.


Over the course of the past six decades, technologists have been building the perfect television. Black-and-white and vacuum tubes have evolved into internet-enabled and on-board CPUs. Pixel density is high, profile depth is low and HDMI connections flow with zero latency. Colors are bright and surround sound systems throw down some mean bass. We control these perfect televisions from remote locations via mobile devices and we live our lives unconfined to program schedules.

But for all the effort we’ve placed on building the perfect television, we have very little to show for it with respect to viewing experience. From network broadcasting to subscription cable to online streaming services, there are hundreds of content channels/streams available to us. Perfect televisions deliver unending content yet nothing is worth watching. We’ve iterated on the infrastructure to such a heightened level, the experience of watching television has fallen off the radar and remains virtually unchanged from its inception in the 1950s.

A compelling experience – one that keeps up with the technological advancements of the infrastructure – has not been designed for us.

In a way, I think this is also where we are with respect to museum technology. Koven’s thoughts fall into perspective when we consider content management systems, collections databases and institutional strategy as infrastructure (the perfect televisions) that can be not only built upon, but designed upon in interesting ways. We can see these elements of experience design taking shape in some of the projects Koven notes in his brief, thought-provoking post.

Innovation is nothing new. Museum technologists, like their counterparts working within other types of organizations, have been innovating for decades. It’s exciting, though, to think we may be in the midst of #MuseTech version 2.0, where institutions can stand tall upon the firm foundations of prior work and look confidently toward intentionally designed experiences that captivate, fascinate and delight users at every turn.

Now, where did I put that remote?

The War Over the Open Web →

I didn’t want to post anything here about Google’s sunsetting of Reader, but this article by Barbara Fister is great and points to the larger issue: the platform war against the open web.

The Silicon Valley alternative to the control exerted over our cultural consumption by old-guard media once seemed refreshingly free. No more. It’s time to think more critically about what we have to lose and look for alternatives – maybe even before we have to.

– Barbara Fister for Inside Higher Ed

There is no mistaking it. The Googles, Twitters and Facebooks of the world want us operating within their walled social gardens. RSS stands in stark contrast to this mission by liberating content and distributing it democratically. Unfortunately, Google Reader is the latest, but not the last, casualty in the war over the open web.

Arabic Programming Language →

Ramsey Nasser is a computer scientist and fellow at Eyebeam Art + Technology Center in New York. His creation “Alb” is a development framework rooted in the arabic alphabet. Part conceptual art piece, part vital technology development, Nasser’s project inspires a discussion about the accessibility of code and the diversity of coders.

“Practically speaking, it’s more sensible to just learn English in order to learn code. That shocked me,” says Nasser. “I believe that code and computation should be something anyone can access.”

This project is exciting to me on several fronts. I’m particularly drawn to projects and artworks that deal with the social implications of technology development and exponentially impact the accessibility of content on the web. This project accomplishes both and I’m interested to follow its lifecycle into future versions and releases.

Auto-Post to ADN

I’m really loving App.net (ADN), the upstart social network built on the premise that its users are its customers and third-party development is the key to a vibrant network. While the benefits of ADN are clear to me, the platform is admittedly in its infancy and some of the more robust features I’m accustomed to with respect to social networks are lacking.

One such feature is the blog auto-post. There is no WordPress plug-in or Twitterfeed-like tool that posts new entries to ADN. Yet.

In the meantime, I’ve hacked together a lo-fi solution using IFTTT and Buffer. For those interested, here is the process:

  1. Activate this shared IFTTT recipe that sends RSS entries into Buffer.
  2. Replace my RSS feed URL with your own.
  3. Connect your Buffer account to ADN.
  4. Modify your Buffer posting schedule to meet your publishing needs. Here’s mine.

That’s it. Now when you post to your site, it will hit ADN like automagic. I’m sure a more streamlined integration is coming shortly, but this hack should work well in the interim.

If you’re so inclined, I’d love to connect over on ADN. I’m @staticmade. Happy posting!

Not Real-Time →

Joshua Gross exploring the idea that the future of the web is not in real-time information flow:

The real-time web is a bit like a fire hydrant—either the valve is opened or closed, but there’s no filter to stem the flow; we become the filter for the massive flow of information. Content should always feel like a gift, not a burden. To turn it into a gift, we need to start focusing on ways to control the flow.

Agreed. To me, the future of the web is a better filtering system — a way to dictate what, how and when desired information makes its way through input channels. The future has yet to be written, but I think it’s in making sure meaningful content gets where it’s supposed to go in a way that’s dictated by the user. The plumbing, if you will.

Timeliness is good, but timelessness, relevance and control are better.

Fifty Dollars and the Future

A few days ago I was invited to join the alpha release of App.net, a new social network platform with an interesting business model. From the website:

We believe that advertising-supported social services are so consistently and inextricably at odds with the interests of users and developers that something must be done.

In order to combat the conventional business strategy of turning a user base into a lucrative product, users and developers that wish to participate on the App.net platform pay an annual subscription – $50 for users, $100 for developers – to access the network. App.net is currently in the tail end of a seed fund campaign with a goal of raising $500,000 by Monday evening. Development of the platform will only move forward if this financial goal is met and at the time of this writing the total raised is $410,000.

After spending a few days experimenting with the alpha and interacting with the 1,000 or so existing users, here is why I believe supporting this platform is important.

1) Organics

The foundation of App.net is most certainly a micro-blogging social network, but I feel calling it a Twitter clone is misrepresenting the potential of the platform. Users are actively participating with App.net and independent 3rd party developers to create a collective vision for how the network should evolve. Syntax, apps, vision and purpose are all being created organically in real-time. That’s exciting for me to see, let alone play a role in.

2) Substance

The dialog occurring on App.net is meaningful. The price-point could most definitely be viewed as a negative for casual users who are used to (and okay with) the existing model of free, ad-supported networks. However, to me the $50 barrier is an instant elimination of Justin Bieber mentions and irrelevant trending topics. People who pay to be a part of something usually take it seriously and so far App.net is no different.

In addition, the monetary barrier to entry will keep spambots at bay. Why would they want to pay $50 just to get booted from the service.

3) Customer Service

As with any alpha product, there are glitches and bugs. When I first joined the alpha, my profile page was returning a 404. Turns out, it was because my username started with “static.” App.net support was extremely responsive and fixed the issue in a matter of minutes. This level of customer service is very difficult to scale as the user base grows, but it is an extremely good sign.

App.net users are the customers. The content I post to App.net is not a product that can be sold to a brand or advertiser. Our business relationship is clear.

Let’s Fund This Thing

If the future of the social web is something you think about or holds even a shred of importance to you, supporting App.net is a no-brainer. The platform has so much potential; it would be a shame to not see this come to fruition.

Join me and thousands of others helping to evolve the social web. Join App.net.

Emails to My Unborn Daughter

Dudes Day

There’s been a lot of talk lately about email. The majority of this recent writing has been about Google’s acquisition of Sparrow, a much-heralded Mac and iOS email client. Bloggers, tech pundits and average dudes are waxing philosophical about the health of the independent developer community, sustainable business models and the relevance of email itself. Good times.

There’s no denying that email is broken. Some are writing about its inherently flawed nature and obsoleteness, while others are making things in an attempt to fix it.

Spoiler: This post is also about email. It’s about email in its most basic state, irrespective of the client or vendor. It’s about potential. It’s about privacy. It’s about the promise of an agnostic platform in an age of proprietary prairies.

Let me explain.

For the past five years, I’ve been writing emails to my son. Shortly after he was born in 2007, I created an email account in his name so I could write to him throughout his childhood and then turn the account over to him when he was of age. Upon opening the account for the first time, he’d be greeted with an archive of his childhood as seen through his father’s eyes.

To date, I’ve sent him a wide array of messages ranging from short one-sentence emails just to let him know I love him to photos of special moments we’ve shared together to diary-like entries that chronicle his developments and our family’s journey together. Our daughter is due to arrive later next month, and I just created an account for her, now that we’ve decided on her name. I sent my first email to my unborn daughter last night.

Why Email?

So why email? Why not a private Facebook page or maybe a shared Evernote notebook? For me, the answers are simple. Ownership and privacy. I want to ensure ownership of the content stays with my children and that the content remains private. I’m talking about privacy in the simplest sense of the word here, not the kind of privacy networks like Facebook lead users to believe is the new standard.

Yes, I understand email can be hacked and messages can be leaked. I don’t believe total information security exists, so given the alternatives, email seems to be the least of all evils. Once content leaves our brains and becomes formalized in the ether, be it in a Moleskine journal or online, the concept of total and complete security flies out the window.

The idea here is that I want this content to exist for my kids in the long-term — when they turn 12 or 14 or 16 or whatever age is appropriate to start tooling around on the internet. Hell, my kids may look at email the way I looked at my Dad’s bell-bottoms when I was 14 and want no part of it. The point though, is that my notes will be available should they desire to access them. And I think they will. They’re good kids.

A lot of users are placing a lot of faith in Facebook and Twitter and Squarespace at the moment, but who ultimately owns the content published on those respective platforms and where will that record of life moments be in five, fifteen or twenty-five years? I’d wager that email will still be around in some form. Facebook? Not so much. Good luck exporting that content from a walled garden.

For all the flack email has been receiving lately, it’s value is proven. Sure, it’s a pain to manage professionally and inboxes are exploding with spam and bacn for many. Efficiently managed, though, email can be a beautiful thing. Email can be a living portal to years of moments — all indexed, timestamped and contextual.

Dude’s Day

I took my son to a local amusement park the other day. Just the two of us on a “Dude’s Day,” as we like to call these excursions. The amusement park was hosting a Superhero meet-and-greet, where kids could meet Spiderman, Hulk, Thor and Captain America. My son is a huge superhero fan, so he was naturally excited. We were both looking forward to this time together for days leading up to the event.

What surprised me, though, was this: As we waited in line to meet the first hero, he asked if I could take his picture and send it to his email. In that moment I realized that he understands what I’m doing and wants to be a part of it. He’s excited and eager to have access to these notes down the road. I think that’s super cool and it makes my effort worthwile.

Email isn’t perfect. Nothing is. But in this instant, and for this purpose, it’s the most appropriate tool for the job.

You Shall Know Google by its Trail of Dead →

Sean Gallagher at Ars Technica on Google’s acquisition of Sparrow:

Like most Sparrow users, the news caught me off-guard; the application had recently been updated in Apple’s App Store, and the latest version had widened its performance lead on Apple’s Mail.app and other Mac OS mail software. But the update turned out to be a final act instead of a prelude to something bigger—and the bow was an undisclosed payday for Leca and Kima Ventures, the French venture capital team that originally backed the company. This is the sort of exit that’s become common to software and Web companies in the current economy, where the only way to get the big payout is to be acquired by a Google, or a Facebook, a Microsoft or an Apple.

I use Sparrow on my desktop and iOS. I absolutely love the application. Sparrow makes email bearable for me, so this is naturally disappointing news.

It’s hard to fault Dom Leca and the Sparrow development team for making the choice to sell out, just as it’s hard to question the decision of Instagram brass to be absorbed into Facebook. What’s disturbing to me, though, is the unstable user environment created by such acquisitions.

I expect such developments when dealing in free apps and lottery ticket business models. It’s harder to stomach when it happens to a shop generating healthy revenue under a viable business strategy. No one saw this one coming.

This Exquisite Forest →

This Exquisite Forest is an intriguing and interactive art project from Chris Milk and Aaron Koblin, in partnership with Google and the Tate. Playing off the concept of the Exquisite Corpse, the piece is an evolving set of collaborative user-created animations that live on the web. From the Exquisite Forest website:

It makes extensive use of Google Chrome’s HTML5 and JavaScript support, as well as Google App Engine and Google Cloud Storage. A physical installation is located in the collection galleries on Level 3 at Tate Modern, and will be open for approximately 6 months beginning on July 23, 2012.

I think it’s great to see projects like this one — which push technological boundaries, raise questions about the participatory nature of art, and blur the lines between physical and virtual — acknowledged by one of the world’s premier contemporary art institutions.